Skip to main content

Beverley vs Modbury Heights

Property investment comparison - Beverley, SA 5009 vs Modbury Heights, SA 5092

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beverley wins 1, Modbury Heights wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeverleyModbury Heights
Median house price$1.0M$985K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%3.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.39%4.50%
1-year house growth+17.1%estimate+14.1%
3-year house growth-+36.3%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.9%
Population1,5786,995

Beverley vs Modbury Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Beverley and $985K in Modbury Heights, so Modbury Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Beverley houses about 4% dearer.

On cash flow, Modbury Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 3.14% in Beverley, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.1% in Beverley (an estimate) and +14.1% in Modbury Heights, so recent momentum favours Beverley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Modbury Heights and 1.2% in Beverley, so landlords in Modbury Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Modbury Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,995 against 1,578, roughly 4.4 times the size of Beverley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Modbury Heights for rental income, Modbury Heights for a lower purchase price, Beverley for recent price momentum, Modbury Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison