Skip to main content

Bexley vs North Kellyville

Property investment comparison - Bexley, NSW 2207 vs North Kellyville, NSW 2155

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bexley wins 3, North Kellyville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBexleyNorth Kellyville
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$850K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.73%
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%5.12%
1-year house growth+2.1%estimate+1.7%
3-year house growth-+25.7%
Vacancy rate1.9%3.0%
Population19,64617,401

Bexley vs North Kellyville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Bexley and $1.8M in North Kellyville, so Bexley is the cheaper entry point, with North Kellyville houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bexley sits at a median of $850K against $700K in North Kellyville, which makes North Kellyville the more affordable unit market and Bexley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.1% in Bexley (an estimate) and +1.7% in North Kellyville, so recent momentum favours Bexley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Bexley and 3.0% in North Kellyville, so landlords in Bexley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bexley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,646 against 17,401, larger than North Kellyville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bexley for a lower purchase price, Bexley for recent price momentum, Bexley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison