Skip to main content

Bidwill vs Wallsend

Property investment comparison - Bidwill, NSW 2770 vs Wallsend, NSW 2287

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bidwill wins 3, Wallsend wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBidwillWallsend
Median house price$890K$890K
Median unit price-$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.04%3.88%
Gross rental yield (units)4.63%4.40%
1-year house growth+9.5%+10.2%
3-year house growth+35.1%+21.4%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.2%
Population4,20213,244

Bidwill vs Wallsend: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $890K in Bidwill and $890K in Wallsend.

On cash flow, Wallsend leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.88%, compared with 3.04% in Bidwill, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Bidwill and +10.2% in Wallsend, so recent momentum favours Wallsend, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bidwill houses are +35.1% and Wallsend houses +21.4%, so Bidwill has compounded faster than Wallsend over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Bidwill and 1.2% in Wallsend, so landlords in Bidwill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wallsend is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,244 against 4,202, roughly 3.2 times the size of Bidwill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wallsend for rental income, Wallsend for recent price momentum, Bidwill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison