Skip to main content

Big Grove vs Hillarys

Property investment comparison - Big Grove, WA 6330 vs Hillarys, WA 6025

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Big Grove wins 4, Hillarys wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBig GroveHillarys
Median house price$1.7M$1.8M
Median unit price$450K$940K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.64%2.81%
Gross rental yield (units)6.22%4.58%
1-year house growth-+23.2%
3-year house growth-+62.5%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.8%
Population22511,200

Big Grove vs Hillarys: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Big Grove and $1.8M in Hillarys, so Big Grove is the cheaper entry point, with Hillarys houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Big Grove sits at a median of $450K against $940K in Hillarys, which makes Big Grove the more affordable unit market and Hillarys the pricier one.

On cash flow, Hillarys leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 1.64% in Big Grove, a gap of 1.17 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Big Grove and 0.8% in Hillarys, so landlords in Big Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Hillarys is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,200 against 225, roughly 50 times the size of Big Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hillarys for rental income, Big Grove for a lower purchase price, Big Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison