Bilgola Plateau vs Cobaki
Property investment comparison - Bilgola Plateau, NSW 2107 vs Cobaki, NSW 2486
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bilgola Plateau wins 2, Cobaki wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bilgola Plateau | Cobaki |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.5M | $2.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $740K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.90% | 2.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.75% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +1.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.7% | 3.1% |
| Population | 3,650 | 203 |
Bilgola Plateau vs Cobaki: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.5M in Bilgola Plateau and $2.5M in Cobaki, so Bilgola Plateau is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Bilgola Plateau leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.90%, compared with 2.01% in Cobaki, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.1% in Cobaki and 3.7% in Bilgola Plateau, so landlords in Cobaki face less competition for tenants.
Bilgola Plateau is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,650 against 203, roughly 18 times the size of Cobaki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bilgola Plateau for rental income, Bilgola Plateau for a lower purchase price, Cobaki for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Bilgola Plateau, NSW 2107
Open Bilgola Plateau suburb profileRecent sales in Bilgola Plateau
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison