Skip to main content

Bilgola Plateau vs Orangeville

Property investment comparison - Bilgola Plateau, NSW 2107 vs Orangeville, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bilgola Plateau wins 2, Orangeville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBilgola PlateauOrangeville
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price-$1.7M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.91%-
Gross rental yield (units)1.62%1.54%
1-year house growth+2.6%+9.8%
3-year house growth-0.9%+3.3%
Vacancy rate2.2%3.1%
Population3,6501,354

Bilgola Plateau vs Orangeville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Bilgola Plateau and $2.5M in Orangeville.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.6% in Bilgola Plateau and +9.8% in Orangeville, so recent momentum favours Orangeville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bilgola Plateau houses are -0.9% and Orangeville houses +3.3%, so Orangeville has compounded faster than Bilgola Plateau over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Bilgola Plateau and 3.1% in Orangeville, so landlords in Bilgola Plateau face less competition for tenants.

Bilgola Plateau is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,650 against 1,354, roughly 2.7 times the size of Orangeville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Orangeville for recent price momentum, Bilgola Plateau for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison