Bingara vs Tingha
Property investment comparison - Bingara, NSW 2404 vs Tingha, NSW 2360
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bingara wins 2, Tingha wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bingara | Tingha |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $380K | $385K |
| Median unit price | $325K | $280K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.76% | 6.38% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.41% | 5.85% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.2% | -10.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | +10.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | - |
| Population | 1,318 | 774 |
Bingara vs Tingha: what the numbers say
The median house price is $380K in Bingara and $385K in Tingha, so Bingara is the cheaper entry point, with Tingha houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Bingara sits at a median of $325K against $280K in Tingha, which makes Tingha the more affordable unit market and Bingara the pricier one.
On cash flow, Tingha leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.38%, compared with 4.76% in Bingara, a gap of 1.62 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.2% in Bingara and -10.0% in Tingha (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bingara, while Tingha went backwards.
Bingara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,318 against 774, larger than Tingha; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tingha for rental income, Bingara for a lower purchase price, Bingara for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison