Skip to main content

Birkdale vs Ferny Grove

Property investment comparison - Birkdale, QLD 4159 vs Ferny Grove, QLD 4055

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birkdale wins 2, Ferny Grove wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBirkdaleFerny Grove
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$830K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.19%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%3.85%
1-year house growth+13.4%+14.3%
3-year house growth+47.4%+46.1%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.9%
Population14,8165,871

Birkdale vs Ferny Grove: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Birkdale and $1.3M in Ferny Grove.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Birkdale and +14.3% in Ferny Grove, so recent momentum favours Ferny Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Birkdale houses are +47.4% and Ferny Grove houses +46.1%, so Birkdale has compounded faster than Ferny Grove over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Ferny Grove and 1.3% in Birkdale, so landlords in Ferny Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Birkdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,816 against 5,871, roughly 2.5 times the size of Ferny Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ferny Grove for recent price momentum, Ferny Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison