Skip to main content

Birkdale vs Seventeen Mile Rocks

Property investment comparison - Birkdale, QLD 4159 vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD 4073

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Birkdale wins 2, Seventeen Mile Rocks wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBirkdaleSeventeen Mile Rocks
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$830K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.16%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%4.34%
1-year house growth+13.4%+9.0%
3-year house growth+47.4%+58.3%
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population14,8162,699

Birkdale vs Seventeen Mile Rocks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Birkdale and $1.3M in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so Birkdale is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Birkdale and +9.0% in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so recent momentum favours Birkdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Birkdale houses are +47.4% and Seventeen Mile Rocks houses +58.3%, so Seventeen Mile Rocks has compounded faster than Birkdale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Seventeen Mile Rocks and 1.3% in Birkdale, so landlords in Seventeen Mile Rocks face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Birkdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,816 against 2,699, roughly 5 times the size of Seventeen Mile Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Birkdale for a lower purchase price, Birkdale for recent price momentum, Seventeen Mile Rocks for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison