Blackburn vs Buckley
Property investment comparison - Blackburn, VIC 3130 vs Buckley, VIC 3240
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackburn wins 2, Buckley wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Blackburn | Buckley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.6M | $1.6M |
| Median unit price | $765K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.22% | 2.07% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +0.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +3.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 6.2% |
| Population | 14,478 | 228 |
Blackburn vs Buckley: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.6M in Blackburn and $1.6M in Buckley, so Buckley is the cheaper entry point, with Blackburn houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Blackburn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.22%, compared with 2.07% in Buckley, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Blackburn and 6.2% in Buckley, so landlords in Blackburn face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Blackburn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,478 against 228, roughly 64 times the size of Buckley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Blackburn for rental income, Buckley for a lower purchase price, Blackburn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison