Skip to main content

Blackbutt vs Vincent

Property investment comparison - Blackbutt, QLD 4314 vs Vincent, QLD 4814

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackbutt wins 2, Vincent wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackbuttVincent
Median house price$530K$550K
Median unit price$570K$510K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%5.19%
1-year house growth+13.3%estimate+14.5%
3-year house growth-+81.7%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.5%
Population7992,213

Blackbutt vs Vincent: what the numbers say

The median house price is $530K in Blackbutt and $550K in Vincent, so Blackbutt is the cheaper entry point, with Vincent houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Blackbutt sits at a median of $570K against $510K in Vincent, which makes Vincent the more affordable unit market and Blackbutt the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.3% in Blackbutt (an estimate) and +14.5% in Vincent, so recent momentum favours Vincent, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Blackbutt and 1.5% in Vincent, so landlords in Blackbutt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Vincent is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,213 against 799, roughly 2.8 times the size of Blackbutt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackbutt for a lower purchase price, Vincent for recent price momentum, Blackbutt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison