Blackett vs Wooli
Property investment comparison - Blackett, NSW 2770 vs Wooli, NSW 2462
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackett wins 2, Wooli wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Blackett | Wooli |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $870K | $870K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.24% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.25% | 5.33% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.5% | +8.5% |
| 3-year house growth | +29.5% | -3.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 2.4% |
| Population | 3,586 | 503 |
Blackett vs Wooli: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $870K in Blackett and $870K in Wooli.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Blackett and +8.5% in Wooli, so recent momentum favours Wooli, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Blackett houses are +29.5% and Wooli houses -3.6%, so Blackett has compounded faster than Wooli over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Blackett and 2.4% in Wooli, so landlords in Blackett face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Blackett is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,586 against 503, roughly 7 times the size of Wooli; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wooli for recent price momentum, Blackett for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison