Skip to main content

Blackstone vs Redlynch

Property investment comparison - Blackstone, QLD 4304 vs Redlynch, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blackstone wins 4, Redlynch wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlackstoneRedlynch
Median house price$915K$920K
Median unit price-$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.51%
Gross rental yield (units)3.85%5.60%
1-year house growth+18.1%+16.9%
3-year house growth+61.9%+34.2%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.4%
Population1,14410,571

Blackstone vs Redlynch: what the numbers say

The median house price is $915K in Blackstone and $920K in Redlynch, so Blackstone is the cheaper entry point, with Redlynch houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.1% in Blackstone and +16.9% in Redlynch, so recent momentum favours Blackstone, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Blackstone houses are +61.9% and Redlynch houses +34.2%, so Blackstone has compounded faster than Redlynch over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Blackstone and 1.4% in Redlynch, so landlords in Blackstone face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Redlynch is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,571 against 1,144, roughly 9 times the size of Blackstone; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blackstone for a lower purchase price, Blackstone for recent price momentum, Blackstone for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison