Skip to main content

Blakehurst vs Terrey Hills

Property investment comparison - Blakehurst, NSW 2221 vs Terrey Hills, NSW 2084

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blakehurst wins 3, Terrey Hills wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlakehurstTerrey Hills
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$950K$2.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)4.51%1.90%
1-year house growth-0.1%estimate+0.6%
3-year house growth-+6.7%
Vacancy rate3.9%0.7%
Population6,6523,142

Blakehurst vs Terrey Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Blakehurst and $2.3M in Terrey Hills, so Blakehurst is the cheaper entry point, with Terrey Hills houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Blakehurst sits at a median of $950K against $2.4M in Terrey Hills, which makes Blakehurst the more affordable unit market and Terrey Hills the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -0.1% in Blakehurst (an estimate) and +0.6% in Terrey Hills, so recent momentum favours Terrey Hills, while Blakehurst went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Terrey Hills and 3.9% in Blakehurst, so landlords in Terrey Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Blakehurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,652 against 3,142, roughly 2.1 times the size of Terrey Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blakehurst for a lower purchase price, Terrey Hills for recent price momentum, Terrey Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison