Skip to main content

Blue Haven vs Gorokan

Property investment comparison - Blue Haven, NSW 2262 vs Gorokan, NSW 2263

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blue Haven wins 2, Gorokan wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBlue HavenGorokan
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price-$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.02%3.72%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%4.55%
1-year house growth+8.9%+13.1%
3-year house growth+19.1%+23.2%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.8%
Population6,5638,624

Blue Haven vs Gorokan: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Blue Haven and $850K in Gorokan.

On cash flow, Blue Haven leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.02%, compared with 3.72% in Gorokan, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Blue Haven and +13.1% in Gorokan, so recent momentum favours Gorokan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Blue Haven houses are +19.1% and Gorokan houses +23.2%, so Gorokan has compounded faster than Blue Haven over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gorokan and 1.8% in Blue Haven, so landlords in Gorokan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Gorokan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,624 against 6,563, larger than Blue Haven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Blue Haven for rental income, Gorokan for recent price momentum, Gorokan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison