Blue Haven vs Welby
Property investment comparison - Blue Haven, NSW 2262 vs Welby, NSW 2575
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blue Haven wins 3, Welby wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Blue Haven | Welby |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | $850K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.02% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.70% | 2.77% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9% | +5.5% |
| 3-year house growth | +19.1% | +7.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.0% |
| Population | 6,563 | 764 |
Blue Haven vs Welby: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Blue Haven and $850K in Welby.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Blue Haven and +5.5% in Welby, so recent momentum favours Blue Haven, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Blue Haven houses are +19.1% and Welby houses +7.5%, so Blue Haven has compounded faster than Welby over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Welby and 1.8% in Blue Haven, so landlords in Welby face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Blue Haven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,563 against 764, roughly 9 times the size of Welby; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Blue Haven for recent price momentum, Welby for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison