Blue Haven vs Willmot
Property investment comparison - Blue Haven, NSW 2262 vs Willmot, NSW 2770
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Blue Haven wins 1, Willmot wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Blue Haven | Willmot |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850K | $850K |
| Median unit price | - | $460K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.02% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.70% | 5.48% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.9% | +7.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +19.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.0% |
| Population | 6,563 | 2,382 |
Blue Haven vs Willmot: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Blue Haven and $850K in Willmot.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.9% in Blue Haven and +7.8% in Willmot (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Blue Haven, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Willmot and 1.8% in Blue Haven, so landlords in Willmot face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Blue Haven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,563 against 2,382, roughly 2.8 times the size of Willmot; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Blue Haven for recent price momentum, Willmot for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison