Skip to main content

Boambee East vs Woodrising

Property investment comparison - Boambee East, NSW 2452 vs Woodrising, NSW 2284

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boambee East wins 1, Woodrising wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoambee EastWoodrising
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$625K$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)4.71%6.62%
1-year house growth+9.1%+13.7%estimate
3-year house growth+14.8%-
Vacancy rate1.3%1.3%
Population5,3041,176

Boambee East vs Woodrising: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Boambee East and $840K in Woodrising.

For units, Boambee East sits at a median of $625K against $555K in Woodrising, which makes Woodrising the more affordable unit market and Boambee East the pricier one.

On cash flow, Boambee East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 4.00% in Woodrising, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.1% in Boambee East and +13.7% in Woodrising (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woodrising, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.

Boambee East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,304 against 1,176, roughly 4.5 times the size of Woodrising; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boambee East for rental income, Woodrising for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison