Bogan Gate vs Forbes
Property investment comparison - Bogan Gate, NSW 2870 vs Forbes, NSW 2871
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bogan Gate wins 2, Forbes wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bogan Gate | Forbes |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $450K | $465K |
| Median unit price | $330K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.20% | 4.80% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.57% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +11.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Population | 269 | 8,157 |
Bogan Gate vs Forbes: what the numbers say
The median house price is $450K in Bogan Gate and $465K in Forbes, so Bogan Gate is the cheaper entry point, with Forbes houses about 3% dearer.
On cash flow, Bogan Gate leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.20%, compared with 4.80% in Forbes, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Forbes and 1.7% in Bogan Gate, so landlords in Forbes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Forbes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,157 against 269, roughly 30 times the size of Bogan Gate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bogan Gate for rental income, Bogan Gate for a lower purchase price, Forbes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison