Skip to main content

Bolwarra Heights vs St Andrews

Property investment comparison - Bolwarra Heights, NSW 2320 vs St Andrews, NSW 2566

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bolwarra Heights wins 3, St Andrews wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBolwarra HeightsSt Andrews
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$520K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.33%
Gross rental yield (units)5.95%3.41%
1-year house growth+7.5%+8.6%
3-year house growth+18.2%+23.7%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.4%
Population3,4365,785

Bolwarra Heights vs St Andrews: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Bolwarra Heights and $1.0M in St Andrews, so Bolwarra Heights is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Bolwarra Heights and +8.6% in St Andrews, so recent momentum favours St Andrews, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bolwarra Heights houses are +18.2% and St Andrews houses +23.7%, so St Andrews has compounded faster than Bolwarra Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bolwarra Heights and 2.4% in St Andrews, so landlords in Bolwarra Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Andrews is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,785 against 3,436, larger than Bolwarra Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bolwarra Heights for a lower purchase price, St Andrews for recent price momentum, Bolwarra Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison