Skip to main content

Bolwarra Heights vs Thirlmere

Property investment comparison - Bolwarra Heights, NSW 2320 vs Thirlmere, NSW 2572

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bolwarra Heights wins 1, Thirlmere wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBolwarra HeightsThirlmere
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$520K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)5.95%-
1-year house growth+7.5%+10.9%estimate
3-year house growth+18.2%-
Vacancy rate1.6%2.2%
Population3,4364,986

Bolwarra Heights vs Thirlmere: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Bolwarra Heights and $1.0M in Thirlmere.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Bolwarra Heights and +10.9% in Thirlmere (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Thirlmere, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Bolwarra Heights and 2.2% in Thirlmere, so landlords in Bolwarra Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Thirlmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,986 against 3,436, larger than Bolwarra Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thirlmere for recent price momentum, Bolwarra Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison