Skip to main content

Bondi Beach vs McMahons Point

Property investment comparison - Bondi Beach, NSW 2026 vs McMahons Point, NSW 2060

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bondi Beach wins 2, McMahons Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBondi BeachMcMahons Point
Median house price$4.6M$4.6M
Median unit price-$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.22%1.63%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.52%
1-year house growth+3.4%-4.4%estimate
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate2.8%2.6%
Population11,5132,315

Bondi Beach vs McMahons Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $4.6M in Bondi Beach and $4.6M in McMahons Point, so McMahons Point is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Bondi Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.22%, compared with 1.63% in McMahons Point, a gap of 0.59 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.4% in Bondi Beach and -4.4% in McMahons Point (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bondi Beach, while McMahons Point went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in McMahons Point and 2.8% in Bondi Beach, so landlords in McMahons Point face less competition for tenants.

Bondi Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,513 against 2,315, roughly 5.0 times the size of McMahons Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bondi Beach for rental income, McMahons Point for a lower purchase price, Bondi Beach for recent price momentum, McMahons Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison