Skip to main content

Bongaree vs Craignish

Property investment comparison - Bongaree, QLD 4507 vs Craignish, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bongaree wins 2, Craignish wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBongareeCraignish
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$570K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%3.62%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.07%
1-year house growth+19.3%estimate+10.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%1.2%
Population8,1622,190

Bongaree vs Craignish: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Bongaree and $1.1M in Craignish, so Craignish is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.60% in Bongaree and 3.62% in Craignish, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.3% in Bongaree (an estimate) and +10.4% in Craignish (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bongaree, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bongaree and 1.2% in Craignish, so landlords in Bongaree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bongaree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,162 against 2,190, roughly 3.7 times the size of Craignish; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Craignish for a lower purchase price, Bongaree for recent price momentum, Bongaree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison