Bongaree vs Peak Crossing
Property investment comparison - Bongaree, QLD 4507 vs Peak Crossing, QLD 4306
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bongaree wins 2, Peak Crossing wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bongaree | Peak Crossing |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $750K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 2.93% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.61% |
| 1-year house growth | +19.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | +72.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.0% |
| Population | 8,162 | 1,016 |
Bongaree vs Peak Crossing: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bongaree and $1.1M in Peak Crossing.
On cash flow, Bongaree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 2.93% in Peak Crossing, a gap of 0.67 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bongaree and 1.0% in Peak Crossing, so landlords in Bongaree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bongaree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,162 against 1,016, roughly 8 times the size of Peak Crossing; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bongaree for rental income, Bongaree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison