Bongaree vs Shute Harbour
Property investment comparison - Bongaree, QLD 4507 vs Shute Harbour, QLD 4802
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bongaree wins 1, Shute Harbour wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bongaree | Shute Harbour |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $705K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 4.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.61% |
| 1-year house growth | +19.3%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.0% |
| Population | 8,162 | 113 |
Bongaree vs Shute Harbour: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.1M in Bongaree and $1.1M in Shute Harbour, so Shute Harbour is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Shute Harbour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.30%, compared with 3.60% in Bongaree, a gap of 0.70 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bongaree and 1.0% in Shute Harbour, so landlords in Bongaree face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bongaree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,162 against 113, roughly 72 times the size of Shute Harbour; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Shute Harbour for rental income, Shute Harbour for a lower purchase price, Bongaree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison