Bonnie Brook vs Hernes Oak
Property investment comparison - Bonnie Brook, VIC 3335 vs Hernes Oak, VIC 3825
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonnie Brook wins 0, Hernes Oak wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bonnie Brook | Hernes Oak |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $685K | $685K |
| Median unit price | $580K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.40% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +2.8% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -0.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.3% | 2.4% |
| Population | 333 | 365 |
Bonnie Brook vs Hernes Oak: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Bonnie Brook and $685K in Hernes Oak.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Hernes Oak and 5.3% in Bonnie Brook, so landlords in Hernes Oak face less competition for tenants.
Hernes Oak is the bigger suburb, with a population of 365 against 333, larger than Bonnie Brook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hernes Oak for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison