Skip to main content

Bonnie Brook vs Walkerville North

Property investment comparison - Bonnie Brook, VIC 3335 vs Walkerville North, VIC 3956

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonnie Brook wins 3, Walkerville North wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBonnie BrookWalkerville North
Median house price$685K$685K
Median unit price$580K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%2.17%
1-year house growth+2.8%-
3-year house growth-0.8%-
Vacancy rate5.3%17.9%
Population3335

Bonnie Brook vs Walkerville North: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $685K in Bonnie Brook and $685K in Walkerville North.

For units, Bonnie Brook sits at a median of $580K against $530K in Walkerville North, which makes Walkerville North the more affordable unit market and Bonnie Brook the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bonnie Brook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 3.05% in Walkerville North, a gap of 1.05 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 5.3% in Bonnie Brook and 17.9% in Walkerville North, so landlords in Bonnie Brook face less competition for tenants.

Bonnie Brook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 333 against 5, roughly 67 times the size of Walkerville North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bonnie Brook for rental income, Bonnie Brook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison