Bonshaw vs Redan
Property investment comparison - Bonshaw, VIC 3356 vs Redan, VIC 3350
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonshaw wins 2, Redan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bonshaw | Redan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $510K | $510K |
| Median unit price | $485K | $380K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.29% | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.68% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +16.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +5.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Population | 949 | 3,000 |
Bonshaw vs Redan: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $510K in Bonshaw and $510K in Redan.
For units, Bonshaw sits at a median of $485K against $380K in Redan, which makes Redan the more affordable unit market and Bonshaw the pricier one.
On cash flow, Bonshaw leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.29%, compared with 4.10% in Redan, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Bonshaw and 0.9% in Redan, so landlords in Bonshaw face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Redan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,000 against 949, roughly 3.2 times the size of Bonshaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bonshaw for rental income, Bonshaw for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison