Skip to main content

Bonshaw vs Sebastopol

Property investment comparison - Bonshaw, VIC 3356 vs Sebastopol, VIC 3356

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bonshaw wins 1, Sebastopol wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBonshawSebastopol
Median house price$510K$510K
Median unit price$485K$395K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.29%4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.68%4.98%
1-year house growth-+19.1%
3-year house growth-+11.0%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.8%
Population94910,194

Bonshaw vs Sebastopol: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $510K in Bonshaw and $510K in Sebastopol.

For units, Bonshaw sits at a median of $485K against $395K in Sebastopol, which makes Sebastopol the more affordable unit market and Bonshaw the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.29% in Bonshaw and 4.30% in Sebastopol, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Bonshaw and 0.8% in Sebastopol, so landlords in Bonshaw face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sebastopol is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,194 against 949, roughly 11 times the size of Bonshaw; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bonshaw for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison