Skip to main content

Boolaroo vs Islington

Property investment comparison - Boolaroo, NSW 2284 vs Islington, NSW 2296

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boolaroo wins 2, Islington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoolarooIslington
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$455K$810K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.74%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.30%
1-year house growth+12.0%+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth+35.4%-
Vacancy rate1.8%1.1%
Population1,6362,026

Boolaroo vs Islington: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Boolaroo and $1.0M in Islington.

For units, Boolaroo sits at a median of $455K against $810K in Islington, which makes Boolaroo the more affordable unit market and Islington the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Boolaroo and +6.3% in Islington (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Boolaroo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Islington and 1.8% in Boolaroo, so landlords in Islington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Islington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,026 against 1,636, larger than Boolaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boolaroo for recent price momentum, Islington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison