Skip to main content

Boolaroo vs Woodford

Property investment comparison - Boolaroo, NSW 2284 vs Woodford, NSW 2778

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boolaroo wins 3, Woodford wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoolarooWoodford
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price$455K$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.41%
1-year house growth+12.0%+9.5%
3-year house growth+35.4%+26.7%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.9%
Population1,6361,953

Boolaroo vs Woodford: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Boolaroo and $1.0M in Woodford.

For units, Boolaroo sits at a median of $455K against $730K in Woodford, which makes Boolaroo the more affordable unit market and Woodford the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Boolaroo and +9.5% in Woodford, so recent momentum favours Boolaroo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Boolaroo houses are +35.4% and Woodford houses +26.7%, so Boolaroo has compounded faster than Woodford over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Woodford and 1.8% in Boolaroo, so landlords in Woodford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woodford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,953 against 1,636, larger than Boolaroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Boolaroo for recent price momentum, Woodford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison