Skip to main content

Boondall vs Yandina

Property investment comparison - Boondall, QLD 4034 vs Yandina, QLD 4561

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boondall wins 1, Yandina wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoondallYandina
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$845K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%3.68%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.35%
1-year house growth+20.5%-
3-year house growth+51.9%+36.1%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.5%
Population9,6033,073

Boondall vs Yandina: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Boondall and $1.2M in Yandina.

For units, Boondall sits at a median of $845K against $745K in Yandina, which makes Yandina the more affordable unit market and Boondall the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yandina leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.68%, compared with 3.10% in Boondall, a gap of 0.58 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Boondall houses are +51.9% and Yandina houses +36.1%, so Boondall has compounded faster than Yandina over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Yandina and 1.6% in Boondall, so landlords in Yandina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Boondall is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,603 against 3,073, roughly 3.1 times the size of Yandina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yandina for rental income, Yandina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison