Skip to main content

Booral vs South Maclean

Property investment comparison - Booral, QLD 4655 vs South Maclean, QLD 4280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Booral wins 3, South Maclean wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBooralSouth Maclean
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price$710K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.66%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.48%3.11%
1-year house growth+5.8%+11.2%estimate
3-year house growth+26.4%-
Vacancy rate0.8%5.0%
Population1,6362,232

Booral vs South Maclean: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Booral and $920K in South Maclean.

For units, Booral sits at a median of $710K against $800K in South Maclean, which makes Booral the more affordable unit market and South Maclean the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.66% in Booral and 3.70% in South Maclean, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.8% in Booral and +11.2% in South Maclean (an estimate), so recent momentum favours South Maclean, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Booral and 5.0% in South Maclean, so landlords in Booral face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Maclean is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,232 against 1,636, larger than Booral; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Maclean for recent price momentum, Booral for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison