Booval vs Sarina Range
Property investment comparison - Booval, QLD 4304 vs Sarina Range, QLD 4737
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Booval wins 1, Sarina Range wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Booval | Sarina Range |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815K | $815K |
| Median unit price | $660K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.64% | 4.24% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.68% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +22.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +63.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 8.3% |
| Population | 2,723 | 277 |
Booval vs Sarina Range: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $815K in Booval and $815K in Sarina Range.
On cash flow, Sarina Range leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.24%, compared with 3.64% in Booval, a gap of 0.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Booval and 8.3% in Sarina Range, so landlords in Booval face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Booval is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,723 against 277, roughly 10 times the size of Sarina Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Sarina Range for rental income, Booval for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison