Boralma vs Clayton South
Property investment comparison - Boralma, VIC 3682 vs Clayton South, VIC 3169
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boralma wins 1, Clayton South wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boralma | Clayton South |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $980K | $985K |
| Median unit price | - | $645K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.43% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.78% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 6.2% | 1.6% |
| Population | 79 | 13,381 |
Boralma vs Clayton South: what the numbers say
The median house price is $980K in Boralma and $985K in Clayton South, so Boralma is the cheaper entry point, with Clayton South houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Clayton South and 6.2% in Boralma, so landlords in Clayton South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Clayton South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,381 against 79, roughly 169 times the size of Boralma; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Boralma for a lower purchase price, Clayton South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison