Borenore vs Tascott
Property investment comparison - Borenore, NSW 2800 vs Tascott, NSW 2250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Borenore wins 2, Tascott wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Borenore | Tascott |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | $435K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.69% | 5.34% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.9% | +6.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +7.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.4% | 1.9% |
| Population | 476 | 1,675 |
Borenore vs Tascott: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.0M in Borenore and $1.0M in Tascott, so Tascott is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.9% in Borenore and +6.2% in Tascott, so recent momentum favours Borenore, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Tascott and 3.4% in Borenore, so landlords in Tascott face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tascott is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,675 against 476, roughly 3.5 times the size of Borenore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tascott for a lower purchase price, Borenore for recent price momentum, Tascott for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison