Skip to main content

Botany vs Eraring

Property investment comparison - Botany, NSW 2019 vs Eraring, NSW 2264

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Botany wins 3, Eraring wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBotanyEraring
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$930K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%1.79%
Gross rental yield (units)5.05%5.33%
1-year house growth-5.5%-
3-year house growth+8.5%-
Vacancy rate1.7%2.6%
Population12,960221

Botany vs Eraring: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Botany and $2.1M in Eraring, so Botany is the cheaper entry point, with Eraring houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Botany sits at a median of $930K against $580K in Eraring, which makes Eraring the more affordable unit market and Botany the pricier one.

On cash flow, Botany leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 1.79% in Eraring, a gap of 1.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Botany and 2.6% in Eraring, so landlords in Botany face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Botany is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,960 against 221, roughly 59 times the size of Eraring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Botany for rental income, Botany for a lower purchase price, Botany for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison