Skip to main content

Botany vs Sylvania

Property investment comparison - Botany, NSW 2019 vs Sylvania, NSW 2224

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Botany wins 4, Sylvania wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBotanySylvania
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$930K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.24%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)5.05%3.18%
1-year house growth-5.5%+5.4%estimate
3-year house growth+8.5%-
Vacancy rate1.7%1.7%
Population12,96010,749

Botany vs Sylvania: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Botany and $2.1M in Sylvania, so Botany is the cheaper entry point, with Sylvania houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Botany sits at a median of $930K against $1.3M in Sylvania, which makes Botany the more affordable unit market and Sylvania the pricier one.

On cash flow, Botany leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 2.89% in Sylvania, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.5% in Botany and +5.4% in Sylvania (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Sylvania, while Botany went backwards.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.7%.

Botany is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,960 against 10,749, larger than Sylvania; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Botany for rental income, Botany for a lower purchase price, Sylvania for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison