Bouddi vs Davistown
Property investment comparison - Bouddi, NSW 2251 vs Davistown, NSW 2251
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bouddi wins 2, Davistown wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bouddi | Davistown |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $840K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.24% | 2.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.85% | 3.84% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +29.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 4.4% | 0.4% |
| Population | 5 | 2,602 |
Bouddi vs Davistown: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Bouddi and $1.3M in Davistown.
On cash flow, Bouddi leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.24%, compared with 2.99% in Davistown, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Davistown and 4.4% in Bouddi, so landlords in Davistown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Davistown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,602 against 5, roughly 520 times the size of Bouddi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bouddi for rental income, Davistown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison