Skip to main content

Bouvard vs Huntingdale

Property investment comparison - Bouvard, WA 6211 vs Huntingdale, WA 6110

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bouvard wins 2, Huntingdale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBouvardHuntingdale
Median house price$820K$820K
Median unit price$425K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.15%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.20%4.28%
1-year house growth+5.4%estimate+15.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%1.4%
Population9109,021

Bouvard vs Huntingdale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $820K in Bouvard and $820K in Huntingdale.

On cash flow, Huntingdale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 4.15% in Bouvard, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.4% in Bouvard (an estimate) and +15.9% in Huntingdale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Huntingdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Bouvard and 1.4% in Huntingdale, so landlords in Bouvard face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Huntingdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,021 against 910, roughly 10 times the size of Bouvard; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Huntingdale for rental income, Huntingdale for recent price momentum, Bouvard for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison