Skip to main content

Box Hill vs Fairfield

Property investment comparison - Box Hill, NSW 2765 vs Fairfield, NSW 2165

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Box Hill wins 1, Fairfield wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBox HillFairfield
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$1.1M$480K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.69%
Gross rental yield (units)3.33%5.42%
1-year house growth+6.0%+11.5%
3-year house growth+16.4%+21.7%
Vacancy rate6.2%1.4%
Population6,45018,596

Box Hill vs Fairfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Box Hill and $1.3M in Fairfield, so Box Hill is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Box Hill sits at a median of $1.1M against $480K in Fairfield, which makes Fairfield the more affordable unit market and Box Hill the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Box Hill and +11.5% in Fairfield, so recent momentum favours Fairfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Box Hill houses are +16.4% and Fairfield houses +21.7%, so Fairfield has compounded faster than Box Hill over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Fairfield and 6.2% in Box Hill, so landlords in Fairfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fairfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,596 against 6,450, roughly 2.9 times the size of Box Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Box Hill for a lower purchase price, Fairfield for recent price momentum, Fairfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison