Skip to main content

Boxers Creek vs Caringbah South

Property investment comparison - Boxers Creek, NSW 2580 vs Caringbah South, NSW 2229

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boxers Creek wins 1, Caringbah South wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoxers CreekCaringbah South
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$560K-
Gross rental yield (houses)1.18%2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)4.13%-
1-year house growth+11.9%+2.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.0%2.1%
Population25913,168

Boxers Creek vs Caringbah South: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Boxers Creek and $2.5M in Caringbah South.

On cash flow, Caringbah South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.89%, compared with 1.18% in Boxers Creek, a gap of 1.71 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Boxers Creek and +2.4% in Caringbah South (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Boxers Creek, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Caringbah South and 6.0% in Boxers Creek, so landlords in Caringbah South face less competition for tenants.

Caringbah South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,168 against 259, roughly 51 times the size of Boxers Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Caringbah South for rental income, Boxers Creek for recent price momentum, Caringbah South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison