Skip to main content

Boxers Creek vs Waitara

Property investment comparison - Boxers Creek, NSW 2580 vs Waitara, NSW 2077

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boxers Creek wins 2, Waitara wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBoxers CreekWaitara
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$560K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.18%2.02%
Gross rental yield (units)4.13%4.76%
1-year house growth+11.9%-5.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate6.0%1.2%
Population2597,837

Boxers Creek vs Waitara: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.5M in Boxers Creek and $2.5M in Waitara.

For units, Boxers Creek sits at a median of $560K against $800K in Waitara, which makes Boxers Creek the more affordable unit market and Waitara the pricier one.

On cash flow, Waitara leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.02%, compared with 1.18% in Boxers Creek, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.9% in Boxers Creek and -5.5% in Waitara (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Boxers Creek, while Waitara went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Waitara and 6.0% in Boxers Creek, so landlords in Waitara face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waitara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,837 against 259, roughly 30 times the size of Boxers Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waitara for rental income, Boxers Creek for recent price momentum, Waitara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison