Boynedale vs Gayndah
Property investment comparison - Boynedale, QLD 4680 vs Gayndah, QLD 4625
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Boynedale wins 1, Gayndah wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Boynedale | Gayndah |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $380K | $380K |
| Median unit price | - | $290K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 7.83% | 5.64% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.09% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.9%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.3% | 0.1% |
| Population | 13 | 1,949 |
Boynedale vs Gayndah: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $380K in Boynedale and $380K in Gayndah.
On cash flow, Boynedale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.83%, compared with 5.64% in Gayndah, a gap of 2.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Gayndah and 2.3% in Boynedale, so landlords in Gayndah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Gayndah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,949 against 13, roughly 150 times the size of Boynedale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Boynedale for rental income, Gayndah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison