Bradbury vs Crafers
Property investment comparison - Bradbury, SA 5153 vs Crafers, SA 5152
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bradbury wins 1, Crafers wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bradbury | Crafers |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.5M |
| Median unit price | - | $635K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.30% | 2.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.13% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +6.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +17.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Population | 178 | 2,006 |
Bradbury vs Crafers: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Bradbury and $1.5M in Crafers, so Bradbury is the cheaper entry point, with Crafers houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Crafers leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.30% in Bradbury, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in Crafers and 2.4% in Bradbury, so landlords in Crafers face less competition for tenants.
Crafers is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,006 against 178, roughly 11 times the size of Bradbury; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Crafers for rental income, Bradbury for a lower purchase price, Crafers for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison