Braeside vs Thornbury
Property investment comparison - Braeside, VIC 3195 vs Thornbury, VIC 3071
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Braeside wins 0, Thornbury wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Braeside | Thornbury |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.5M | $1.5M |
| Median unit price | $1.1M | $715K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.81% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.53% | 4.55% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Population | 25 | 19,005 |
Braeside vs Thornbury: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Braeside and $1.5M in Thornbury.
For units, Braeside sits at a median of $1.1M against $715K in Thornbury, which makes Thornbury the more affordable unit market and Braeside the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.4%.
Thornbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,005 against 25, roughly 760 times the size of Braeside; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison