Breakwater vs Katandra
Property investment comparison - Breakwater, VIC 3219 vs Katandra, VIC 3634
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Breakwater wins 1, Katandra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Breakwater | Katandra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $580K | $575K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.18% | 4.56% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +8.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 4.0% |
| Population | 1,060 | 120 |
Breakwater vs Katandra: what the numbers say
The median house price is $580K in Breakwater and $575K in Katandra, so Katandra is the cheaper entry point, with Breakwater houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Katandra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.56%, compared with 4.18% in Breakwater, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Breakwater and 4.0% in Katandra, so landlords in Breakwater face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Breakwater is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,060 against 120, roughly 9 times the size of Katandra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Katandra for rental income, Katandra for a lower purchase price, Breakwater for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison