Skip to main content

Brighton East vs Surrey Hills

Property investment comparison - Brighton East, VIC 3187 vs Surrey Hills, VIC 3127

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brighton East wins 2, Surrey Hills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrighton EastSurrey Hills
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price-$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.94%
1-year house growth+0.1%estimate-6.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.4%2.6%
Population16,75713,655

Brighton East vs Surrey Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Brighton East and $2.2M in Surrey Hills, so Surrey Hills is the cheaper entry point, with Brighton East houses about 2% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.1% in Brighton East (an estimate) and -6.5% in Surrey Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Brighton East, while Surrey Hills went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Brighton East and 2.6% in Surrey Hills, so landlords in Brighton East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Brighton East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,757 against 13,655, larger than Surrey Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Surrey Hills for a lower purchase price, Brighton East for recent price momentum, Brighton East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison