Skip to main content

Brighton-Le-Sands vs Earlwood

Property investment comparison - Brighton-Le-Sands, NSW 2216 vs Earlwood, NSW 2206

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Brighton-Le-Sands wins 4, Earlwood wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBrighton-Le-SandsEarlwood
Median house price$2.1M$2.1M
Median unit price$940K$965K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.43%
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%3.83%
1-year house growth+0.7%-0.4%estimate
3-year house growth+7.5%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population8,33618,053

Brighton-Le-Sands vs Earlwood: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Brighton-Le-Sands and $2.1M in Earlwood, so Brighton-Le-Sands is the cheaper entry point, with Earlwood houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Brighton-Le-Sands sits at a median of $940K against $965K in Earlwood, which makes Brighton-Le-Sands the more affordable unit market and Earlwood the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.7% in Brighton-Le-Sands and -0.4% in Earlwood (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Brighton-Le-Sands, while Earlwood went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Earlwood and 1.4% in Brighton-Le-Sands, so landlords in Earlwood face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Earlwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,053 against 8,336, roughly 2.2 times the size of Brighton-Le-Sands; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Brighton-Le-Sands for a lower purchase price, Brighton-Le-Sands for recent price momentum, Earlwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison