Skip to main content

Broadmeadow vs Robertson

Property investment comparison - Broadmeadow, NSW 2292 vs Robertson, NSW 2577

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Broadmeadow wins 3, Robertson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBroadmeadowRobertson
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$750K$645K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)3.90%5.56%
1-year house growth+6.0%estimate+1.1%
3-year house growth-+2.4%
Vacancy rate2.6%3.4%
Population1,6882,017

Broadmeadow vs Robertson: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Broadmeadow and $1.2M in Robertson, so Broadmeadow is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Broadmeadow sits at a median of $750K against $645K in Robertson, which makes Robertson the more affordable unit market and Broadmeadow the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.0% in Broadmeadow (an estimate) and +1.1% in Robertson, so recent momentum favours Broadmeadow, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Broadmeadow and 3.4% in Robertson, so landlords in Broadmeadow face less competition for tenants.

Robertson is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,017 against 1,688, larger than Broadmeadow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Broadmeadow for a lower purchase price, Broadmeadow for recent price momentum, Broadmeadow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison